Maximum disk usage exceeded, Error in stderr of a Task Налаштування

[Saenger]

I've got this message in my stderr of the last crunched WU:

CODE

<core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Maximum disk usage exceeded
</message>
<stderr_txt>

</stderr_txt>
]]>

It was running considerably longer than usual, and I have 2 more that look like this one waiting to crunch on my machine. Is it something to be expected for them as well?

[Saenger]

Some more info, this time about the second delinquent:
Messages from BOINC:

CODE

Sa 09 Apr 2011 18:21:02 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Starting 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0
Sa 09 Apr 2011 18:21:03 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Starting task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 using lodci16x128 version 1612
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:57:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Aborting task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0: exceeded disk limit: 52.52MB > 51.20MB
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:57:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    [sched_op_debug] Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:57:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    [sched_op_debug] Reason: Unrecoverable error for result 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 (Maximum disk usage exceeded)
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Computation for task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 finished
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Output file 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_0 for task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 absent
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Output file 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_1 for task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 absent
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:45 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Started upload of 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_2
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:45 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Started upload of 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_3
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:48 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Finished upload of 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_2
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:51 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Finished upload of 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_3

So it ran for 80 min, but doesn't say so in the result.

[SLinCA-Yuri]

Some more info, this time about the second delinquent:
Messages from BOINC:

Sa 09 Apr 2011 18:21:02 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Starting 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0
Sa 09 Apr 2011 18:21:03 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Starting task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 using lodci16x128 version 1612
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:57:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Aborting task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0: exceeded disk limit: 52.52MB > 51.20MB
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:57:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    [sched_op_debug] Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:57:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    [sched_op_debug] Reason: Unrecoverable error for result 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 (Maximum disk usage exceeded)
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Computation for task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 finished
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Output file 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_0 for task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 absent
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:43 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Output file 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_1 for task 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0 absent
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:45 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Started upload of 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_2
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:45 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Started upload of 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_3
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:48 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Finished upload of 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_2
Sa 09 Apr 2011 19:58:51 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Finished upload of 47375b12-d4f5-42d3-bd77-abaaab291da5_864dc1ff-d810-41bc-a8f6-969d6b58d42a_814_0_3

So it ran for 80 min, but doesn't say so in the result.

Dear Saenger,
Owing to you we found the misprint in configuration of this application and fixed it.
The related workunits with faulty requirements to HDD space were marked as faulty and deleted.
thanks for your observation!

[Saenger]

Owing to you we found the misprint in configuration of this application and fixed it.

The problem reappeared:
From BOINC:

CODE

Mo 18 Apr 2011 04:15:07 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Resuming task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0 using lodci16x128x version 1613
Mo 18 Apr 2011 06:09:34 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Aborting task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0: exceeded disk limit: 512.92MB > 512.00MB
Mo 18 Apr 2011 06:17:46 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Computation for task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0 finished
Mo 18 Apr 2011 06:17:46 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Output file b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0_0 for task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0 absent
Mo 18 Apr 2011 06:17:46 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Output file b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0_1 for task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0 absent

From the WU:

CODE

Run time    92797.15
stderr out    

<core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Maximum disk usage exceeded
</message>
<stderr_txt>

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Validate state    Invalid
Claimed credit    690.388214438495
Granted credit    0
application version    16.13

25h running, and then being ditched is no fun.

[SLinCA-Yuri]

Owing to you we found the misprint in configuration of this application and fixed it.

The problem reappeared:
From BOINC:

Mo 18 Apr 2011 04:15:07 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Resuming task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0 using lodci16x128x version 1613
Mo 18 Apr 2011 06:09:34 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Aborting task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0: exceeded disk limit: 512.92MB > 512.00MB
Mo 18 Apr 2011 06:17:46 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Computation for task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0 finished
Mo 18 Apr 2011 06:17:46 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Output file b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0_0 for task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0 absent
Mo 18 Apr 2011 06:17:46 CEST    SLinCA@Home    Output file b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0_1 for task b78b5a9c-e890-4ebf-bebd-33162cdeac63_39a79c83-2b0f-4b40-a4e5-5bf051dd6b85_27_0 absent

From the WU:

Run time    92797.15
stderr out    

<core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Maximum disk usage exceeded
</message>
<stderr_txt>

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Validate state    Invalid
Claimed credit    690.388214438495
Granted credit    0
application version    16.13

25h running, and then being ditched is no fun.

Dear Saenger!

thanks for your comment - recently we fixed configurations for Windows-client only in this version (lodci16x128x),
but missed the same bug in configurations for Linux-client of this version (lodci16x128x).

Thanks for your care!
We doubled your credit points for this faulty task!
I beg your (and other participants') pardon for such confusion!

[Saenger]

Dear Saenger!

thanks for your comment - recently we fixed configurations for Windows-client only in this version (lodci16x128x),
but missed the same bug in configurations for Linux-client of this version (lodci16x128x).

Thanks for your care!
We doubled your credit points for this faulty task!
I beg your (and other participants') pardon for such confusion!

Thanks for that, it's Beta, so I had to expect some of those
So even more thanks to the enhanced credits!